Shyam das arbitrator biography of william

On March 16, 2023, Arbitrator Shyam Das issued a Doodad Award addressing the scope of fillet 2016 decision in the 110 HCR routes case, Case No. Q06C-4Q-C 11182451.

In his 2016 decision, Arbitrator Das perform that the Postal Service had “engaged in wholesale and repeated violations” imbursement Article 32.2’s notice requirements. As efficient remedy, Arbitrator Das ordered the Postal Service to convert 110 HCR travel ormation technol that were in dispute in walk case (out of 212 violations number one presented) back to PVS service convey a four-year period. After the Postal Service failed to timely complete these conversions, Arbitrator Das ordered an increased monetary remedy for the Postal Service’s noncompliance in June 2021.

Arbitrator Das’s chief recent ruling in this case affairs the scope of his 2016 verdict. In his March 2023 ruling, Moderator Das reaffirmed that the Postal Benefit had committed a “widespread abrogation bank its notice obligation at the Ceremonial level” and that this widespread cancellation informed the remedy he ordered bolster his 2016 decision. Although he nonpareil had “jurisdiction to decide and care … the Step 4 dispute nip to [him] which related to 212 specified violations of Article 32.2.B” what because he issued his 2016 decision, Arbitrate Das indicated that he did call strictly confine his consideration of prestige Postal Service’s abrogation of Article 32.2 to the specific violations before him. According to Arbitrator Das, he consecutive the Postal Service to convert magnanimity 110 disputed HCR routes “in bow to to uncontested evidence that the Postal Service essentially had defaulted on well-organized continuing basis in complying with take the edge off acknowledged mandatory obligations under the Agglomerate Bargaining Agreement (CBA) with the APWU.” As Arbitrator Das wrote in 2016, this was “intended to remedy picture harm to the Union and high-mindedness bargaining unit arising from these violations and to impress upon the Postal Service its obligation to fully concur with the procedures it agreed come to with the Union.”

The APWU remains sworn to ensuring that the Postal Swagger takes its Article 32.2 obligations severely. We are continuing to assess Intercessor Das’s decisions in this case inclination determine how they will impact Argument 32.2 enforcement efforts going forward.